Follow us on Twitter→ 2012 President
Wednesday, February 8, 2012

You are here: Home > Climate Change, Current Events, Guest Bloggers, Immigration, Mexico > How Mexico Should Handle Climate Change Challenges

How Mexico Should Handle Climate Change Challenges

by Election Supervisor on August 20, 2010 · 3 comments

in Climate Change,Current Events,Guest Bloggers,Immigration,Mexico

Guest Post By Amber Davis
Government Relations Specialist, Progressives for Immigration Reform

http://www.progressivesforimmigrationreform.org/take-action/pfir-bloggers-unite/

How Mexico Should†Handle Climate Change Challenges

According to research published July 26 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the impact of climate change on crop yields may force as many as seven million Mexicans to emigrate to the U.S. over the next 70 years. Michael Oppenheimer of Princeton University, an author of the study stated that, “climate changes predicted by the global circulation models would cause several percent of the Mexican population to move north if all other factors are held constant.”

Oppenheimer predicted that for every 10 percent of lost crop yields, 2 percent more Mexicans will leave that country, and most will relocate to the United States. By the year 2080, Oppenheimer projected that between 1.4 and 6.7 million Mexican adults will emigrate as a result of reduced farm productivity.

Oppenheimer’s team looked at Mexican census data from 1995 to 2005, along with statistics on crop production and climate data. According to Oppenheimer, researchers “lined up the climate changes, and the crop production changes . . . with the census data,” which allowed them to infer Mexico’s emigration rate.

During the past two decades, Mexico has begun experiencing environmental changes that have deeply impacted its farming population. During the last few years Mexico has continued to endure its most severe drought in six decades. Mexico experienced a severe drought starting in 1994 that persisted throughout this period. Elizabeth Fussell of Washington State University argues that these lengthy drought spells make farmers more “susceptible to these climate effects since there was no time to adapt to them. Migration is one of several options rural households face when they confront diminishing livelihoods such as a decline in crop yields.”

Of course, climate change is just the latest pull factor that has been encouraging massive migration in the northern Mexico region. The rapid rise of maquiladora and other manufacturing in Mexican border regions during the 1990s increased demand for labor enormously and encouraged large-scale migration to northern Mexican states. During the early 1990s the Mexican economy was also in major crisis as urban unemployment burgeoned and the peso devalued. At the same time there were significant displacements of farmers as a result of the agricultural liberalization that was a part of the NAFTA agreement. These factors caused a shortage of jobs in the interior of Mexico and further encouraged migration to border regions and the US.

Like his recent predecessors, Mexican President Felipe Calderon has not been able to adequately address the social tensions that these large-scale displacements have caused. He has, however, shown more commitment to curbing environmental threats than several previous Mexican administrations. President Calderon has repeatedly said that climate change is the greatest challenge facing his nation. He wants Mexicans to commit to cutting their own emissions in half by 2050. He has urged the setting up of a global “Green Fund,” which would receive contributions from all but the poorest countries in the world to finance environmentally friendly projects.

Mexico has also taken steps to encourage the development of renewable energy. Around 17% of its electricity now comes from hydro dams. Iberdrola, a Spanish utility, is building a giant wind farm at La Ventosa (“the windy place”), an area in the southern state of Oaxaca, which features gusts strong enough to topple trucks. This will provide power to 200,000 people, and avoid the emission of 150,000 tons of carbon dioxide each year. Calderon has also been attempting to encourage Q-Cells, a German company, to set up a factory to manufacture solar panels and adopt solar power in northern Mexico.

Despite these advancements Mexico must still implement a number of policy changes in order to cope with the socioeconomic and environmental challenges it will face this century. One of the most obvious strategies Mexico must embrace is curbing its population growth. Despite experiencing one of the most dramatic declining fertility rates in the world since 1970, at 2.5 children per woman, Mexico’s birthrate is still much higher than nations in the industrialized world.

Mexico’s population topples over the 100 million mark and the country does not currently posses the infrastructure or resources to properly provide for such a large populace. Population declines would place less pressure on agricultural production within Mexico and provide young families with greater opportunity to invest in education and career pursuits. Of course, such radical shifts in culture in a deeply conservative country will take time and a great deal of leadership by Mexican political and social elite. Considering the growing conservative stance Americans have been taking towards immigration, it is unlikely that America will continue to serve as a safety valve for Mexico as the country deals with climate change challenges.

The 2012 Presidential Election is fast approaching

The White House

The GOP race is now a field of 4 with only Romney, Gingrich, Paul, & Santorum still standing. Who will be the next candidate to exit the race & who will emerge as the eminent GOP nominee?

Follow us on Twitter & join our 2012 election FaceBook page for updates & new blog articles.

Contact us if you are passionate about politics & want to blog with us.


{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

1 J Byron of OutRageToday.com August 21, 2010 at 12:02 am

A Davis, Sorry

Reply

2 J Byron of OutRageToday.com August 21, 2010 at 12:01 am

A David, B Davis here,

I’ve read that Princeton Study on StratFor.com. 10% CROP FAILURE 2% IMMIGRATION North.

We have an initial conflict, you and I. You see climate change as being the primary catalyst for change. While that may be on the list of issues, it wouldn’t even make my top ten.

Drug Cartels? No, Government Corruption? no Excessive wealth in the hands of a few? No Under-developed natural resources? Again No.

Communist Party. Yeppers! The dirty little secret (and classified that way, If I’d read this from some gov doc, and said this I could be arrested)

Since the fall of Cuba, foriegn money, insurgents and interest who want the free market to fall and cause a vote for a Communist Leadership has been a top priority of each American Administration. Wonder why conservatives like Reagan and the Bush’s drug their heals on immigration to their own political peril? They had too. That money, in addition to direct aid props up the free market and keeps the foriegn financed and influenced Communist from taking the country on our own southern boarder. Imagine Venezuala (a Chavez) on our border! Taking in Russian Scientist, Chinese money for infrastructure.

Climate change? Just another excuse to transfer American resources to prop up a free Mexico.

Reply

3 Consti Tution August 23, 2010 at 12:06 pm

Let’s not forget that this has been a problem BEFORE climate change was invented by the progressives. (Even before Al Gore invented the internet!) Back in the 50′s with only 700 field officers we had a major decline in immigration thanks to the efforts of one man.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/history/american/4011-deporting-illegal-immigrants

Climate change! HA!

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: