“Come in rabbit hut this is monkey wrench. Over?” Sorry, Consti here in the Bunker communications room trying to get the news out about the Global warming debate that was supposed to be over. I’d like to dedicate this post to Albert Arnold “Al” Gore, Jr. The man who has spent his post political career pushing what is appearing to be a farce. Since most people have been inundated with this dogma I’d like to bring up just a few recent items to catch everyone up.
Now let me go on record here. Growing up in Chicago I know full well that SNOW is a four (4) letter word. Shoveling it as a kid made me swear I would never shovel it again. Anyone with a T.V. news paper, internet, or other media has seen the record setting crippling snow that has hit the East Coast. But record snow in Dallas? (24-hour snowfall record now at 12.5 inches! The previous daily record was 7.8 inches on Jan. 15, 1964, and Jan. 14, 1917 and the previous 24-hour record was 12.1 inches) Record snow and rainfall in Arizona even?
Now before you progressives try to remind me that “weather” is not “climate” let me just remind you of a few things your own Democrats have said in the recent past.
RFK Jr. – RFK, Jr. 15 months ago: Global warming means no snow or cold in DC. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who flies around on private planes so as to tell larger numbers of people how they must live their lives in order to save the planet, wrote a column last year on the lack of winter weather in Washington, D.C. News alert for RFK Washington DC has had the most recorded snow in over 100 years! That’s the problem with predicting the future. You have half a chance of being horribly, horribly wrong.
Congressional statements –
BYRD 2002. We need a climate change strategy badly. Look at the kind of winter we’ve had here in Washington. One snow, three inches? What can we expect for the spring and summer seasons?
BOXER 2007. He also remarked that the most optimistic climate models for the second half of this century suggest that 30 to 70% of the snow pack will disappear.
KLOBUCHAR 2008. I heard it from the head of our snowmobile association who testified at a forum that I had with our governor on climate change in January because they’ve seen decreasing snow levels. I hear about it from ice fishermen because they have seen that it takes longer for the ice to freeze and they can’t put their fish house out.
FEINSTEIN 2005. The Sierra Nevada snow pack is the largest source of water. The snow pack equals about half the storage capacity of all of California’s man-made reservoirs. By the end of the century, the shrinking of the snow pack will eliminate the water source for 16 million people.
BOXER 2007. The potential consequences will be devastating for our families in the future and for the world. Now we’re seeing the early warning signs. People can come down to this floor and say whatever they want. We’ve seen melting of snow, we have seen melting of permafrost, increased temperatures, warming of lakes, rivers, oceans, changes in the seasons.
DeMINT 2010. It’s going to keep snowing in DC until Al Gore cries “uncle”.
So for all those of you who will try to call me out for the difference between “weather” and “climate” all I have to say is this. Talk to your own people who haven’t got a clue FIRST! Then we can talk. Now let’s take a look at some of the science that is falling apart under the disinfectant of sun light.
The Himalayan Glaciers will melt by 2035 – Apparently this claim originated in a NEWS article and is not based on science AT ALL! The scientist credited with this finding has come out to admit that the information in the IPCC report is completely false. So why did it take him this long to admit this fact? Could it be funding grants? Also he admitted that there may have been other errors in the same section of the report, and said that he was considering whether to take action against those responsible.
Alaska Glaciers – Two hundred years of glacial shrinkage in Alaska, and then came the winter and summer of 2007-2008. When the glaciers GREW apparently to global warming? Hello…. Logic?
U.N. IPCC report (Global Warming Bible) – Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said it would be hypocritical to apologize for the false claim that Himalayan glaciers could melt away by 2035, because he was not personally responsible for that part of the report. “You can’t expect me to be personally responsible for every word in a 3,000 page report,” he said. Um… HELLO! You are the HEAD of the IPCC! The buck stops with you pal!! That means YOU are responsible for the accuracy of the report YOUR panel releases. IT”S YOUR JOB!! Also background note by the IPCC said a 2007 report wrongly stated that 55 percent of the Dutch country was below sea level since the figure included areas above sea level, prone to flooding along rivers. If this were my Public High School science paper wrought with these errors I would get an F- for a grade. Yet this report is touted as the guiding light in climate change. Irrefutable as the dogma of the religion of global warming goes.
Scientific cronyism – Accused of withholding information and obstructing counter scientific research, Professor Jones claims he has most likely LOST the relevant information related to manmade global warming. Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon. So the professor who FOUNDED the theory of global warming now says that it may not be manmade. Let me repeat that. The guy behind global warming ADMITS that there has been no measurable increase in temperature in the last 15 years. Once more the Professor behind the core of global warming theory says it’s NOT MANMADE. So much for unequivocal proof eh?
So when Al Gore and Joe Biden claimed that the debate was over well I guess they were wrong. There are BILLIONS of dollars at risk due to global warming legislation. Shouldn’t we be ABSOLUTELY SURE of the science first? I have a question for the readers.
Will Al Gore admit to the truth NOW and return the millions he invested in Green tech?
Consti.
The 2012 Presidential Election is fast approaching

The GOP race is now a field of 4 with only Romney, Gingrich, Paul, & Santorum still standing. Who will be the next candidate to exit the race & who will emerge as the eminent GOP nominee?
Follow us on Twitter & join our 2012 election FaceBook page for updates & new blog articles.
Contact us if you are passionate about politics & want to blog with us.












{ 64 comments… read them below or add one }
← Previous Comments
hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!
PARIS (AFP) – – Estimates of the rate of ice loss from Greenland and West Antarctica, one of the most worrying questions in the global warming debate, should be halved, according to Dutch and US scientists.
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/afp/20100908/tts-climate-warming-science-ice-c1b2fc3.html
HAHAHAHAH!!!
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627633.700-shapeshifting-islands-defy-sealevel-rise.html
Couldn’t have said it better myself…
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/may/06/climate-science-open-letter
HAHAHA-HAHAHA-HAHAHAHAHAHA-HA!
http://www.gallup.com/poll/126560/Americans-Global-Warming-Concerns-Continue-Drop.aspx
http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_14631028?nclick_check=1
Laura,
You’re delusional. And since I’m not worth your time I find it amazing I am still harassed by you. If I wasn’t worth your time I’d expect you to keep your mouth shut, but I see you fail at that as well. You only think you provide facts, and for destroying mine… .interesting choice of words. You and Dough boy do have alot in common.
Thanks for the laugh!
And admitting to trying to deliberately “set me up,” but I am the one who needs to “Get a life. Get a hobby. Get laid.”? Are you that starved for any kind of interaction?
LOL
Me- talked facts and destroyed yours
You- personal insults and evasions
Who pushed whose buttons? LOL
how does it feel to have your buttons pushed so easily?
Laura,
I only provided the link… I didn’t claim it as proof… that is an assumption you are making. Despite your arrogance OTHER people might like to read the article and take away from it what they will. You however will ascribe what ever dribble you like to it. Again, this was a set up on you. A simple link with no comment and I get a 5 paragraph rant from you. This was the expected response from you and agian you never fail to satisfy. Thank you for further being a great example for zealotry for me.
According to you, if the data is bogus, then so is the argument. Well if your links, which you site as “proof” are bogus, then aby that logic so is your argument. You provide the links. You site them as proof. Not me.
If you can’t find valid and credible “proof” for your argument, maybe you need to rethink that argument. Either that, or do the work to find links, or as you call them “proof”, that actually support your claims.
The rest sounds like nothing more than sour grapes to me…As I said, are personal insults all you’ve got, gotcause you haven’t shown anything else.
Laura,
What points? All I did was post a link and you ranted on your own. YOU made the assumption about the meaning of my posting that link. I didn’t even comment in detail. So why should I address YOUR assumptions about the meaning of that link. You didn’t even rant about something I said. You my dear are the one who spends her time ranting over the supposed meaning of a LINK to a story. That’s pretty pathetic and telling of your zealotry.
Get a life. Get a hobby. Get laid. Somthing, but climbing on my back simply because I post a link to an article relevant to the story I wrote is a pathetic cry for attention.
Thank you for you comments. They have been duly noted and filed in the round bin. I encourage you to continue to comment and express your opinion. Like all opinions it serves a purpose.
Don’t address the points, as usual…go for the insult…
That all you got?
Laura,
HAHAHA! Thought I wasn’t worth your time. Again, a simple link and you rant for 5 paragraphs. Pathetic.
Thank you for you comments. They have been duly noted and filed in the round bin. I encourage you to continue to comment and express your opinion. Like all opinions it serves a purpose.
← Previous Comments
{ 1 trackback }